EU Regulation Evaluation: Integration as Exclusion: The Keren Case Revisited – Model Slux

EU Regulation Evaluation: Integration as Exclusion: The Keren Case Revisited – Model Slux

  Dr Sarah Ganty, LL.M. (Yale), Ph.D. (ULB); J.S.D. candidate, Yale Regulation College; F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral Fellow, UCLouvain; Analysis Customer, Bonavero Institute of Human Rights (Oxford); Analysis Fellow, CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest); President of the YLS European Regulation Affiliation Photograph: Raad van State (the referring courtroom), through Wikimedia Commons   Final February, the Grand Chamber of … Read more

Transposing Directives not so discretionary! The Courtroom of Justice forces transposition of discretionary exclusion grounds and hints at ‘intra-State’ vertical direct impact (C‑66/22) — Tips on how to Crack a Nut – Model Slux

Transposing Directives not so discretionary! The Courtroom of Justice forces transposition of discretionary exclusion grounds and hints at ‘intra-State’ vertical direct impact (C‑66/22) — Tips on how to Crack a Nut – Model Slux

** This remark was first printed as an Op-Ed for EU Legislation Stay on 8 December 2022 (see formatted model). I’m reposting it right here in case of broader curiosity. ** On the face of it, in Infraestruturas de Portugal and Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias (C-66/22), the Courtroom of Justice needed to assess whether or not … Read more

x